1. It's sometimes hard to teach people about media, either because they don't understand what you're trying to say, or they don't want to understand it. I would like to know the most efficient way of getting through to people that it is better to be media literate than media illiterate.
2. Will media ever be regulated so the audience will know whether what they are watching/reading is the truth or not? It would be great to know if the media has a brighter future, and I feel like the only way to make sure this happens is if more people take classes like this one.
3. Lastly, and this question is almost impossible to answer, but how long will it take for corporations and any other advertiser trying to sell people things to realize that they are only making the world a worse place by not educating people on why they do the things they do?
Writing these questions makes me want to find the answers and use the information I've learned to educate people on the importance of media literacy.
Sunday, May 2, 2010
Week 14 Responses
1. The corporation was a very informative view of the business world and had some interesting points in it that I hadn't known before. These included the facts that a corporation has most of the legal rights that a person would have, and that the greediness and pursuit of power of corporations is like that of a clinical psychopath.
2. Consuming Kids does a great job of exploiting the exploiters, the brand name corporations that realize children are the next generation of consumers and spend billions to advertise to them. It should be illegal to influence kids without them knowing what is happening to their lives.
3. Toxic Sludge is Good For You was a great way to expose the truth about what public relations firms really do. I learned that I shouldn't trust things that seem too good to be true without doing my own research on the topic first, because chances are a PR firm is behind it.
4. Disney is a beast that's only beautiful to the untrained eye (or brain). It's shocking that they own so many movie studios, TV channels, adventure parks, and countless other things that are legally protected and can influence children in countless ways they see fit.
5. Monsanto was brought up during many topics during the course of the class and not once did I hear a good thing about it. Just about every non organic food product available to consumers has some sort of connection with Monsanto, which goes back to how scary corporate power is.
6. The readings and short movie about how women are made out to be objects was disturbing to say the least, and although I have noticed this on TV and the internet my whole life, I learned some interesting new facts to go along with it.
7. The books we read were fun and educational at the same time. Feed was an easy read and keeps my brain out of the feed network indefinitely. Culture Jam and Ad Nauseam were great activist books with tons of revealing facts and information. They were all great.
8. The environmental art project was a good way to see how media effected everyone in the class a different way, and making my stick laptop has actually kept me from just browsing the internet from time to time.
9. The internet in general is also a big part of this class and was technically a good and bad thing. During my responses each week I would browse the internet and keep up with my facebook profile, but it can also be a tool to help educate others.
10. Educating others, last but not least, has been one of the main points of the class and I enjoy every opportunity I get to tell others about media rights and wrongs. I myself was educated a great deal during the course of this class and although I still go everywhere with an open mind, I remember that the media is out to influence me in one way or another, so I stay on guard.
2. Consuming Kids does a great job of exploiting the exploiters, the brand name corporations that realize children are the next generation of consumers and spend billions to advertise to them. It should be illegal to influence kids without them knowing what is happening to their lives.
3. Toxic Sludge is Good For You was a great way to expose the truth about what public relations firms really do. I learned that I shouldn't trust things that seem too good to be true without doing my own research on the topic first, because chances are a PR firm is behind it.
4. Disney is a beast that's only beautiful to the untrained eye (or brain). It's shocking that they own so many movie studios, TV channels, adventure parks, and countless other things that are legally protected and can influence children in countless ways they see fit.
5. Monsanto was brought up during many topics during the course of the class and not once did I hear a good thing about it. Just about every non organic food product available to consumers has some sort of connection with Monsanto, which goes back to how scary corporate power is.
6. The readings and short movie about how women are made out to be objects was disturbing to say the least, and although I have noticed this on TV and the internet my whole life, I learned some interesting new facts to go along with it.
7. The books we read were fun and educational at the same time. Feed was an easy read and keeps my brain out of the feed network indefinitely. Culture Jam and Ad Nauseam were great activist books with tons of revealing facts and information. They were all great.
8. The environmental art project was a good way to see how media effected everyone in the class a different way, and making my stick laptop has actually kept me from just browsing the internet from time to time.
9. The internet in general is also a big part of this class and was technically a good and bad thing. During my responses each week I would browse the internet and keep up with my facebook profile, but it can also be a tool to help educate others.
10. Educating others, last but not least, has been one of the main points of the class and I enjoy every opportunity I get to tell others about media rights and wrongs. I myself was educated a great deal during the course of this class and although I still go everywhere with an open mind, I remember that the media is out to influence me in one way or another, so I stay on guard.
Sunday, April 25, 2010
Week 13 Response
Our PSA was more interesting to plan that it was to film, considering we only had to film for about ten seconds. I went in as the lead editor without knowing much about editing, but I'm glad I did because I now know how much work has to go into a well edited movie. I was able to tell friends and family members about why I was making a public service announcement about turning off lights, electronics, and water when you're not using them and it seems like I got my message through to most of them. Our group worked very well together once we actually had time to meet up and get work done. Colin provided most of the facts and figures we used, and James helped with the final editing cut since he's the most media savvy of the 3 of us. The only thing left to do is to find the perfect piece of music to use in the background and to complete our credits scene.
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Week 12 Responses
2. Common sense media is a website designed to give parents an accurate opinion on what media they should be letting their children experience. They have a rating system that goes by age and judges movies, TV shows, music, video games, and websites. The problem is that kids happen to be maturing at much younger ages as they experience new age media and therefore might consider this kind of website as biased, or representing old ideals. The site seems to be aimed at younger children, those younger than 15, and is very reasonable in the reviews that say no children should be allowed to watch a certain movie/show. I think this is a great site for concerned parents but I don't believe kids will support the safety the site is trying to give, especially if parents flat out tell them they can't visit a website or see a movie. Online activism is definitely apparent on Common Sense Media because the creators are trying to repress the illusion that kids today can view anything without being influenced in the wrong way. Children of any age can flip through TV channels and see violence, sex, cursing, and many other bad examples, and they should know what all of this means.
3. Our PSA hasn't had much progress this week, but the addition of James to our group is good because he has some knowledge of editing, so I am not worried about running out of time when we put all of our pictures/clips together with music. We are doing good in terms of content to use in our PSA, while James and Colin have been working on getting facts about energy and water use to put as subtitles. Editing is all we have left to do.
Sunday, April 11, 2010
PSA Status
Over the weekend, Colin and I got some great shots of the lake, a bunch of different electric meters, running water, electronics that use a lot of power, and buildings lit up at night. Although some of our PSA might contain video, the majority of it will consist of still images and facts about our topic. We haven't decided whether to narrate it or not, but we can always add that in later. Once we get a few more good pictures/videos, our focus will be mastering the basics of iMovie editing. I have high hopes that it will come together well.
Week 11 Responses
1. As Toxic Sludge Is Good For You says, real democracy must be the common work and invention of all of us acting together. However, this statement and democracy don't account for how small grassroots organizations and citizens pose a greater threat to PR industries than environmental protection agencies do. The PR industry is constantly working to keep the public in the dark as long as we continue consuming blindly. A true democratic society is governed by the people, for the people. I wouldn't necessarily say that we are governing ourselves anymore if all we are doing is listening to what the PR industries tell us to do. It's good that democracy can sometimes be hard to predict, because this throws the PR industry off balance. Thinking back to Feed, a corporation won't be able to classify you as the average consumer because your actually using your mind and not letting other people's examples influence you. It's sad that money=power in our current political system, because corporations can now control policies that are in their favor, continuously sweeping democracy under the rug. I feel as if we no longer make our own decisions, and even though I haven't had much experience with politics, I've never felt further out of the loop with my own government. If the only way to hear about political news is through PR influenced TV, internet, and radio, I don't have high hopes for democracy.
2. I spent closer to an hour down by the waterfront today, and I just have to reiterate that I love being outdoors. I am lucky enough to live in a rural part of New Jersey, so while outside when I'm at home, I don't have to listen to the drone of highway noise or loud neighbors. Being next to the water gave me this same sense of satisfaction because the cool breeze and splashing waves drowned out any noise from cars and other people. I was able to clear my mind for the first time in a while, and the warm sun mixed with the breeze made for a very calming sensation. Some find the calls of seagulls to be annoying, but I didn't mind them one bit as I sat there. I admit that I should have left my cell phone at home because I found myself answering texts from time to time, but it was otherwise a very refreshing media free experience.
My half an hour of media was spent watching Hulu on my computer since I don't have a TV in my room. The show I decided on is called Modern Family, one of the only shows on TV I find remotely funny, and the first commercial that comes up is the World's First Reality Hair Star. What is the world coming to? Women in the ad describe their hair as "the most important part of their body and their daily routine". I laugh out loud because I find this more funny than anything that happened on the show so far. As the show continues, besides the occasional funny lines, I find myself growing restless, and I realize I haven't blinked in minutes. I also realize that not once do they show a scene outdoors or people doing anything active. I don't necessarily feel as if I've wasted a half an hour of my life, but I definitely would have rather spent it outside doing something fun.
2. I spent closer to an hour down by the waterfront today, and I just have to reiterate that I love being outdoors. I am lucky enough to live in a rural part of New Jersey, so while outside when I'm at home, I don't have to listen to the drone of highway noise or loud neighbors. Being next to the water gave me this same sense of satisfaction because the cool breeze and splashing waves drowned out any noise from cars and other people. I was able to clear my mind for the first time in a while, and the warm sun mixed with the breeze made for a very calming sensation. Some find the calls of seagulls to be annoying, but I didn't mind them one bit as I sat there. I admit that I should have left my cell phone at home because I found myself answering texts from time to time, but it was otherwise a very refreshing media free experience.
My half an hour of media was spent watching Hulu on my computer since I don't have a TV in my room. The show I decided on is called Modern Family, one of the only shows on TV I find remotely funny, and the first commercial that comes up is the World's First Reality Hair Star. What is the world coming to? Women in the ad describe their hair as "the most important part of their body and their daily routine". I laugh out loud because I find this more funny than anything that happened on the show so far. As the show continues, besides the occasional funny lines, I find myself growing restless, and I realize I haven't blinked in minutes. I also realize that not once do they show a scene outdoors or people doing anything active. I don't necessarily feel as if I've wasted a half an hour of my life, but I definitely would have rather spent it outside doing something fun.
Sunday, April 4, 2010
Week 10 Responses
Chapter 8
-I thought it was funny how the WEF marketed its new biosolids to be used on farms and orchards, because most of the general public doesn't know that farms already use a fertilizer that contains human waste and remains from the industrial sewage industry.
-Sludge contains most of the things you would think it consists of like many types of bacteria and chemical compounds, but I had no idea of all the other harmful things that could turn up in sewage such as arsenic, lead, mercury, and asbestos.
-It is amazing that the selective use of government money to research toxins and sewage goes only to the EPA to find new uses for the sludge, and not to toxicologists and public health officials that would use the research money to find out how bad these chemicals actually are.
-The part about how stealth is New York City's new weapon against the war on sludge is somewhat ridiculous because it's basically just like sweeping dust and dirt under a rug. New York now keeps all information about where they dump their trash very private even to the point where the townspeople of the town they decide to dump in don't know it.
-It's scary to imagine that current science and technology can't even uncover the truth about the dangers of most chemicals in sludge and waste. Sure, they can assess the risk of common things like pesticides, chemicals, and radioactivity, but the evolving microbes of new pathogens are developing immunities to our antibiotics and becoming whole new threats we don't even know how to gauge.
-My question is how do I know if my town harbors these sludge dumpings from big cities and if it really is legal to deceive whole towns and even states with private dumping?
Chapter 9
-Public relations experts who work for companies who's sales would take a blow from new pesticidal information like the Velsicol employees should not be able to lie to the public like they did when Silent Spring was published. Instead of spending budgeted money to cover up what people write about their products, they should be investing in safer chemicals to use.
-Greenwashing and environmental public relations are all around us, trying to tell us that anyone who stands up to their companies for polluting or not being as green as they could be is an eco-terrorist fear monger. When a company announces how they are becoming greener, further research should be done to make sure they're actually doing anything about it at all.
-"EDF assists McDonald's in fooling the public into believing that something significant has occurred". This type of lying should not be legal in the slightest, and now McDonald's can go on polluting and selling pesticide covered foods while the public believes that they're trying to be more environmentally conscious by using recycled materials for their bags one day out of the year.
-Some popular PR campaigns that corporations use now try to make it seem as if you are the one at fault for spoiling the environment instead of them. I hardly believe that pollution percentages are more greatly affected by my everyday actions rather than a corporation pumping CO2 out of it's smokestacks 24/7.
-Changing your name doesn't make you a different person. Changing a corporation's name doesn't change the fact that they pollute more now than they did under the previous name. It is shocking what some people will believe just by changing their surroundings.
-My question is when is government going to step in and lay down some laws for the legality of public relations, because as I see it, they lie their way out of every corner.
-I thought it was funny how the WEF marketed its new biosolids to be used on farms and orchards, because most of the general public doesn't know that farms already use a fertilizer that contains human waste and remains from the industrial sewage industry.
-Sludge contains most of the things you would think it consists of like many types of bacteria and chemical compounds, but I had no idea of all the other harmful things that could turn up in sewage such as arsenic, lead, mercury, and asbestos.
-It is amazing that the selective use of government money to research toxins and sewage goes only to the EPA to find new uses for the sludge, and not to toxicologists and public health officials that would use the research money to find out how bad these chemicals actually are.
-The part about how stealth is New York City's new weapon against the war on sludge is somewhat ridiculous because it's basically just like sweeping dust and dirt under a rug. New York now keeps all information about where they dump their trash very private even to the point where the townspeople of the town they decide to dump in don't know it.
-It's scary to imagine that current science and technology can't even uncover the truth about the dangers of most chemicals in sludge and waste. Sure, they can assess the risk of common things like pesticides, chemicals, and radioactivity, but the evolving microbes of new pathogens are developing immunities to our antibiotics and becoming whole new threats we don't even know how to gauge.
-My question is how do I know if my town harbors these sludge dumpings from big cities and if it really is legal to deceive whole towns and even states with private dumping?
Chapter 9
-Public relations experts who work for companies who's sales would take a blow from new pesticidal information like the Velsicol employees should not be able to lie to the public like they did when Silent Spring was published. Instead of spending budgeted money to cover up what people write about their products, they should be investing in safer chemicals to use.
-Greenwashing and environmental public relations are all around us, trying to tell us that anyone who stands up to their companies for polluting or not being as green as they could be is an eco-terrorist fear monger. When a company announces how they are becoming greener, further research should be done to make sure they're actually doing anything about it at all.
-"EDF assists McDonald's in fooling the public into believing that something significant has occurred". This type of lying should not be legal in the slightest, and now McDonald's can go on polluting and selling pesticide covered foods while the public believes that they're trying to be more environmentally conscious by using recycled materials for their bags one day out of the year.
-Some popular PR campaigns that corporations use now try to make it seem as if you are the one at fault for spoiling the environment instead of them. I hardly believe that pollution percentages are more greatly affected by my everyday actions rather than a corporation pumping CO2 out of it's smokestacks 24/7.
-Changing your name doesn't make you a different person. Changing a corporation's name doesn't change the fact that they pollute more now than they did under the previous name. It is shocking what some people will believe just by changing their surroundings.
-My question is when is government going to step in and lay down some laws for the legality of public relations, because as I see it, they lie their way out of every corner.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
